Cases 101 - 110 of 680
Barreras v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 4:2018cv00797
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Gabino Barreras
Undetermined:
Jay C Zeleskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Contreras v JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2018cv00434
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Contreras
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hewitt v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2018cv04340
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Bruce Hewitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Burch et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2018cv02731
Plaintiff:
William P. Burch, Juanita Burch and William Paul Burch
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank and Loan Care Servicing Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2018cv03789
Defendant:
Any to Act as Substitute Trustee, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Home Finance, LLC
Plaintiff:
Esperidion Rivera
Darksi Corporation v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2018cv03669
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Universal American Mortgage Company
Plaintiff:
Darksi Corporation
Rubio v. Bonial & Associates, P.C. et al
as 4:2018cv03307
Defendant:
Texas Department of Business Oversight, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Texas Secretary of State and others
Plaintiff:
Isabel Cristina Rubio
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MacDonald v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 7:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee MacDonald
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank and Substitute Trustee David R. Karle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2018cv04014
Plaintiff:
Delores Thomas
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williamson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2018cv03437
Plaintiff:
Cristy Williamson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
