Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Mary Castro v. SN Servicing Corporation
as 16-50387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY ANN CASTRO
Defendant - Appellee:
SN SERVICING CORPORATION
Mryna D. Grajo et al v. SN Servicing Corporation et al
as 7:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
Myrna D. Grajo and Gonzalo E. Grajo
Defendant:
SN Servicing Corporation , William D Larew , Arnold Mendoza and others
Intervenor:
MNH Sub I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mary Castro v. SN Servicing Corporation
as 15-50937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY ANN CASTRO
Defendant - Appellee:
SN SERVICING CORPORATION
Castro v. SN Servicing Corporation
as 5:2015cv00715
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Castro
Defendant:
SN Servicing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Rodriguez v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 7:2014cv00739
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and SN Servicing Corporation
Plaintiff:
Karina G. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Gomez v. SN Servicing et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 7:13CV8
as 7:2013cv00353
Defendant:
SN Servicing Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, Assigns, Agents and/or Representatives
Plaintiff:
Hiram Timoteo Gomez
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Hiram Timoteo Gomez v. SN Servicing Corporation et al
as 7:2013cv00166
Plaintiff:
Hiram Timoteo Gomez
Defendant:
SN Servicing Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gomez v. SN Servicing Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association
as 7:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Hiram Timoteo Gomez
Defendant:
SN Servicing Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Martinez, et al v. SN Servicing Corp.
as 5:2012cv01042
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Martinez and Maria M. Martinez
Defendant:
SN Servicing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
