Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gomez et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00657
Plaintiff:
Veronica Trevino Garza, Individually and A/N/F o Vxxxxxxx Txxxxxx, a Minor, Santana Arias Gomez, Jesus Esparza, Individually and A/N/F of Axxxx Exxxxxx, a Minor and others
Defendant:
NSK, Ltd, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK Precision America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodlands Apartments, LLC et al v. Dovetail Builders, Inc.
as 4:2017cv03788
Plaintiff:
Woodlands Apartments, LLC and Woodlands Condominiums, LLC
Defendant:
Dovetail Builders, Inc., 31-W Insulation Co., Inc., Schulte Roofing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mario Esparza, et al v. Citimortgage, Incorporated
as 12-10287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO ESPARZA and HECTOR ESPARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED
Diaz et al v. Bank of America NA et al
as 3:2012cv00476
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Diaz and Maria Esparza
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, MERS Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Esparza et al v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01552
Plaintiff:
Mario Esparza and Hector Esparza
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esparza v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 3:2010cv00346
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Esparza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Ayers et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
Robert Ayers, Jill Ayers, John Baker and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.68 ACRE OF LAND, more or less, et al
as 1:2008cv00260
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.68 ACRE OF LAND, more or less,, J. D. Esparza, Arnulfo Lerma and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
