Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Williams v. JC Fodale Energy Services, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Courtney Williams
Defendant:
JC Fodale Energy Services, LLC, Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C., Chesapeeake Oilfield Services, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shane v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 5:2013cv01070
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Shane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jiminez v. Halliburton Company et al
as 5:2013cv00920
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Halliburton Company
Plaintiff:
Luis Jiminez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ponder v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv02620
Plaintiff:
Billy Ponder
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation , Chesapeake Operating, Inc. , Chesapeake Land Development Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce et al v. NOMAC Drilling LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00204
Plaintiff:
George Steven Bruce and Sheila Bruce
Defendant:
NOMAC Drilling LLC and Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Intervenor:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reynolds v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation
as 2:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
James R Reynolds
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corp
as 2:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
Barbara Dennis , Jill Dennis , Lauren Dennis and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hopel v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01157
Plaintiff:
Kevin Paul Hopel and Kevin Paul Hopel
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
