Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00483
Notice Only:
Richard L. Bonnafons and Leo Caillier, III
Defendant:
Bridgestone Bandag, LLC, Southern Tire Mart, L.L.C. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rockett Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Christy v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv01846
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Christy
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company , United Parcel Service, Inc. and David Patrick Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ned v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2015cv02500
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc , Liberty Mutual Insurance Co and Clarence Johnson
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ned
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ned v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02500
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Clarence Johnson
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ned
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv01167
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company , United Parcel Service, Inc , Chiquita Brands Company, North America and others
Plaintiff:
Akeem Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051
Magee et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. et al
as 2:2012cv01302
Plaintiff:
Ollie L. Magee , Clifton Pittman and Andrew Thornton
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., United Parcel Service, Inc. and Scott E. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cochran v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01249
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Cochran
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Croft v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2009cv00760
Plaintiff:
Mark Scott Croft
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, United Parcel Service, Inc. and Loyd W. Alllen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
