Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Smith v. 3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
as 4:2019cv01377
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00414
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Perez
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Hector Gonzalez, Nathan Fall, Richard Guillory and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dowell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00344
Plaintiff:
David Dowell, Dagoberto Galvan, Garrett Guthrie and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00343
Plaintiff:
Joshua Benavides, Aaron Butler, James Bradley and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00263
Plaintiff:
Fernando Garza, Josue Rivas, Keith Harvey and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez, Jr. v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00226
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe William Contreras, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2019cv00233
Plaintiff:
Heath Osborn, Daniel Romero, Jacob Windnagle and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Petitioner:
Sonya Jo Hoye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edison v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2019cv01985
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Garry Edison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
