Cases 51 - 60 of 105
Hunt v. Ramos et al.
as 4:2018cv00140
Plaintiff:
John Hunt
Defendant:
Edwardo Rodriguez Ramos and Intermodal Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos-Villalobos et al v. Uzpro Trans LLC et al
as 4:2017cv03428
Defendant:
Uzpro Trans LLC and Roman Nikolaevich Statsenko
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramos-Villalobos and Pablo Ramos-Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Performance Contracting Inc
as 4:2017cv02852
Plaintiff:
Yessenia Ramos
Defendant:
Performance Contracting Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Martinez-Ramos et al v. Oler et al
as 2:2017cv00601
Plaintiff:
Andres Martinez-Ramos , Victor Rodriguez , Jose Rivera and others
Defendant:
Eric R Oler and Syvokas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramos v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 7:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Roland Ramos
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. CRST Expedited, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Blanca Ramos
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Tommy Hilfiger Wholesale Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ramos
Defendant:
Tommy Hilfiger USA, Inc. and Tommy Hilfiger Wholesale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
FILING ERROR
as 1:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ramos
Defendant:
Tommy Hilfiger USA Inc and Tommy Hilfiger Wholesale Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Esquivel v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Evelio Aguilar Esquivel
Defendant:
Marcos Ramos, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Luster v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC
as 4:2016cv02824
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers, LLC and John J Ramos
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Luster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
