Cases 91 - 100 of 166
Meneses v. Lozano et al
as 7:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Joel Cardenas Meneses
Defendant:
Eduardo Lozano, Anibal Alaniz, Gabriel Gaytan and others
Consol_defendant:
Guadalupe Mendoza and John Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. Donaldson et al
as 7:2016cv00036
Defendant:
Jimmy Binga, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Executive Director et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Executive Director, Eddy Wheeler, Formby Unit State Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dean Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Cockrell et al
as 3:2015cv03580
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ross
Defendant:
Assistant Warden D Cockrell, Major K Session and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Doe
as 7:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe, Deana D Davis, Wilber L Kemph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osby v. Stephans et al
as 4:2015cv02801
Plaintiff:
Lord Harlech Osby
Defendant:
William Stephens, Tracy Bailey, Chris LaCox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Budestean v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Budestean
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowell v. Stephens et al
as 4:2015cv01261
Plaintiff:
David Lewis Rowell
Defendant:
William Stephens, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Crawford
as 5:2015cv00261
Defendant:
John Doe Aguillone, D. Crawford, John Doe, I and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portis v. Valdez et al
as 3:2015cv00918
Plaintiff:
Vyron Untion Portis
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
