Cases 101 - 110 of 115
Roughley v. Wright et al
as 7:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
James A Roughley
Defendant:
Vikki Wright, John E Wilson, David Potter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Begelton v. Sheffield et al
as 7:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Travis Dayne Begelton
Defendant:
Helen Sheffield, Kenneth W Lee, Nathaniel Quarterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foreman v. Wilkinson et al
as 7:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
Percy Foreman
Defendant:
D Wilkinson, B Tinkham, J Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Livingston et al
as 7:2007cv00160
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr.
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Eddie C. Williams and Tommy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Page et al
as 7:2007cv00123
Plaintiff:
Taurus Brown
Defendant:
Steven Page, Kevin Hoover, Kevin Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Anders et al
as 7:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Alexander
Defendant:
James Anders, Tommy Norwood and Glenda Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Williams et al
as 7:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
Billy Frank Hale
Defendant:
Eddie C. Williams, Tommy Norwood, James D Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bourgeois v. Williams et al
as 7:2007cv00106
Plaintiff:
David Bourgeois
Defendant:
Eddie Williams, Clyder L. Hargrove, Jr., Rocky Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2007cv00101
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Norwood
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norwood v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2007cv00066
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Norwood
Defendant:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
