Cases 71 - 80 of 263
Shell v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2022cv03160
Plaintiff:
Robert Noble Shell
Defendant:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, Mr or Mrs. Jon Doe, Dr. Jon or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 4:2022cv03048
Plaintiff:
Andre DeCarl Thompson
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network and Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford v. Gonzalez
as 4:2022cv03027
Petitioner:
Larry Wayne Sanford
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baker v. Gonzalez
as 4:2022cv02916
Petitioner:
Arnecia Baker
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Harris Health Department et al
as 4:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
James Wallace Fields
Defendant:
Harris Health Department and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Routt v. Gonzalez
as 4:2022cv02758
Petitioner:
David Lee Routt
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayward v. Harris County Jail
as 4:2022cv02642
Plaintiff:
Glen Lee Hayward, Jr.
Defendant:
Harris County Jail, Carlos Smith, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2022cv02484
Petitioner:
Frankie Williams
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spates v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2022cv02460
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Spates
Defendant:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and Harris Health Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaedchens v. Ogg et al
as 4:2022cv02303
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Gaedchens
Defendant:
Kim Ogg, Te'iva Bell, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
