Cases 1 - 10 of 269
Jaycox v. TDCJ ID Agency et al
as 5:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Floyd Junior Jaycox
Defendant:
TDCJ ID Agency, Bryan Collier, John Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Boyd
as 1:2023cv00915
Petitioner:
Aubrey Floyd Hart
Respondent:
Calvin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McHenry v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Jimmy Floyd McHenry
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. TDCJ et al
as 6:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Randy Floyd
Defendant:
TDCJ, State of Texas, Hughes Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie David Floyd v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Willie David Floyd
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
David Washington and David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
