Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Donnelly v. 249th District Court et al
as 3:2024cv02275
Plaintiff:
Erik Donnelly
Defendant:
Wayne Bridewall, Sean Bagwell, Connie Longoria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03156
Petitioner:
Buford Lloyd Crowell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donnelly v. 249th District Court, Guinn Justice Center et al
as 4:2024cv02819
Defendant:
District Clerk David R. Lloyd, Connie Longoria, 249th District Court, Guinn Justice Center and others
Plaintiff:
Erik Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01575
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Frost v. USA
as 2:2024cv00125
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Benjamin Lloyd Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00207
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Woods v. Houston Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Bryant Woods
Defendant:
Houston Police Department, Ian Thomas Lloyd and Lori Chambers Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurland v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04431
Petitioner:
Lloyd Kurland
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vonallman v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01450
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lloyd Vonallman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Beckstrand v. Beckstrand et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Kevin Beckstrand
Defendant:
Erin Beckstrand, Lloyd Whelchel and Richard J. Corbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
