Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Tawe v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv03469
Plaintiff:
Richard N. Tawe
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Bryan Collier, Oliver J. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGrew v. USA
as 3:2017cv00560
Petitioner:
William Steven McGrew, Sr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burleson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2017cv00041
Petitioner:
Samuel Burleson
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
State of Texas and William Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burleson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2017cv00042
Petitioner:
Samuel Burleson
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
State of Texas and William Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burleson v. Estelle Unit
as 4:2016cv01804
Plaintiff:
Samuel Burleson
Respondent:
Estelle Unit
Defendant:
Tiffany A. Benson, Gaye L. Karriker, William Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lathan v. Stevens et al
as 2:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lathan
Defendant:
William Stevens, M. Alsobrook and K Gaitan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Stevens
as 4:2016cv00277
Petitioner:
Herbert Ellis
Respondent:
William Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burleson v. Stevens
as 1:2015cv00829
Petitioner:
Samuel Jedediah Burleson
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens and William Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burleson v. Stevens
as 1:2015cv00780
Petitioner:
Samuel Jedediah Burleson
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens and William Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Sooter et al
as 2:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
Wendell Alan Lee
Defendant:
Kelly J Sooter, Seth G Klein, Barry L Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
