Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY $823,818.73 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 7:2021cv00026
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY $823,818.73 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
Gladys Ramirez and Victor M Guerra
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
USA v. 2016 Lexus RX, Vin No. 2T2BZMCA4GC038210
as 2:2019cv00226
Defendant:
2016 Lexus RX, Vin No. 2T2BZMCA4GC038210
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Griselda Munoz-Ornelas and Alejandra Ramirez-Jurado
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Ramirez
as 3:2017cv00821
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
United States of America v. $11,473.00 United States Currency
as 7:2015cv00260
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,473.00 United States Currency
Claimant:
Fidencio Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States Of America v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Check in the Amount of $68,271.14
as 3:2007cv00108
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Respondent:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Check in the Amount of $68,271.14
Claimant:
Cristina Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. One 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe, Vin: 1GNEK13T1R111155, Texas License Plate Z75BJC
as 5:2007cv00198
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
One 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe, Vin: 1GNEK13T1R111155, Texas License Plate Z75BJC
Claimant:
Tina Dunivant Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States Of America v. Seventeen Thousand Two Hundred Sixty-three Dollars ($17,263.00) In United States Currency
as 7:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Seventeen Thousand Two Hundred Sixty-three Dollars ($17,263.00) In United States Currency
Claimant:
Abelardo Martin Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5316 Report on Monetary Instruments
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
