Cases 31 - 40 of 150
Ashcraft v. Mud Mixers, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv01995
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Ashcraft
Defendant:
Mud Mixers, LLC, Q'Max Solutions and Q'Max America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
McDonald v. Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00305
Plaintiff:
Arthur McDonald
Defendant:
Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - ERISA
Monroe v. WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00960
Plaintiff:
Howard Monroe
Defendant:
WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc. and John Does (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilson v. Oracle America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01079
Defendant:
Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle Corporation
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Whitaker v. BHP Billiton Petroleum (Americas) Inc.
as 4:2017cv02698
Plaintiff:
Josh Whitaker
Defendant:
BHP Billiton Petroleum (Americas) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Williams v. Extended Stay America Inc
as 3:2017cv01877
Plaintiff:
Amy Williams
Defendant:
Extended Stay America Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HARRISON v. CHIPOLBROK AMERICA, Inc.
as 4:2017cv01951
Plaintiff:
Judy A Harrison
Defendant:
Chipolbrok America, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Wade v. Furmanite America, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Furmanite America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Wade
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Woodward et al v. Seadrill Americas, Inc.
as 4:2016cv03022
Plaintiff:
Dennis Woodward , Robert Laws and Vernon L. Cromuel
Defendant:
Seadrill Americas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ortiz Reyes v. Superior Technology Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00976
Defendant:
Mastec North America, Inc. and Superior Technology Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Deuderit Ortiz Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
