Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Nichols v. GEV Wind Power U.S., LLC
as 4:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Arlo Nichols
Defendant:
GEV WIND POWER U.S., LLC
Nichols v. Austin Bridge & Road LP
as 3:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nichols
Defendant:
AUSTIN BRIDGE & ROAD, LP and Austin Bridge & Road LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macias v. Nichols Oil Tools, LLC
as 7:2021cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jesus Macias
Defendant:
Nichols Oil Tools, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nichols v. Global Experience Specialists, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00916
Plaintiff:
Nicole Nichols
Defendant:
Global Experience Specialists, Inc., City of Austin, Edward Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nichols v. AMD Energy Services LLC Et Al
as 7:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
Kyle Nichols
Defendant:
ALBERT DeHOYOS and AMD ENERGY SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Neves-Knight et al v. BRM Home Health, PLLC et al
as 1:2018cv00201
Defendant:
Rodney Mesquias, Merida Health Care Group, Inc., Jose Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Miles, Nita Hilburn, Nichole Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schroppel et al v. Fidelity Paper & Supply Corp
as 3:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Fidelity Paper & Supply Corp
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Schroppel and Spirrial Nichols
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hodge et al v. Palmer Consulting & Inspection Service, Inc.
as 7:2018cv00194
Defendant:
Palmer Consulting & Inspection Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nichole Hodge and Arthur Feeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller et al v. Cactus Bar, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Tania Miller , Nichol Monahan and Michelle Nemoede
Defendant:
Cactus Bar, Inc. , Melissa Tivis , Randy Tivis and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nichols v. Barnsco Inc
as 3:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ernest Nichols
Defendant:
Barnsco Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
