Cases 111 - 120 of 323
Clark et al v. Keystone RV Company et al
as 3:2014cv00635
Plaintiff:
Betty Clark and Clyde W. Clark
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company, U.S. Bank, NA and United Mobile Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
RREF Magnolia Loan, LLC v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2014cv02287
Plaintiff:
RREF Magnolia Loan, LLC
Defendant:
James L. O'Brien, Ronald H. Bordelon and Clyde J Phillips, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox v. EBR Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2014cv00588
Defendant:
Baton Rouge City Court, City Court Record Office, EBR Sheriff Office and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Leon Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. Richwood Correctional Center et al
as 3:2014cv02362
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wyatt
Defendant:
Richwood Correctional Center, Warden Richwood Correctional Center and Mike Fendall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derricott v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01268
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda California Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Derricott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pontefract v. USA
as 2:2014cv01079
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Clyde J Pontefract
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cutrer v. Tabakov et al
as 2:2014cv01183
Defendant:
Ivan Tabakov and Kamaz Express Corporation
Plaintiff:
Clyde M Cutrer, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al
as 3:2014cv00234
Defendant:
Scott Angelle, Lambert Boissiere, Foster L. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Occidental Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pines v. Hurst et al
as 3:2014cv00066
Defendant:
Cindy Hooge, Cliff Hurst, James LeBlanc and others
Interested Party:
William Kline
Plaintiff:
Micheal W. Pines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
