Cases 111 - 120 of 541
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00647
Plaintiff:
Thomas Donald Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Valence v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 et al
as 2:2008cv01121
Plaintiff:
Andy Valence
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2, C.R. Bard, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wake v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00619
Plaintiff:
Dustin R. Wake
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grove v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00618
Plaintiff:
Walter Ritchie Grove
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giaccetti v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00617
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Giaccetti
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Welmer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00620
Plaintiff:
Jill Ann Welmer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gifford v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00317
Plaintiff:
Jessie Ann Gifford
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ivey v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00752
Plaintiff:
Earl Ivey
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Sloan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Janice J. Sloan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barker et al v. C.R. Bard, et al
as 4:2007cv04557
Plaintiff:
Daniel F Barker, Lucille F Bragg, Pamela Cameron and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
