Cases 141 - 150 of 292
Veraseal LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Veraseal LLC
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Bericap Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Closure System International, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation and Walgreen Co.
Intervenor Defendant:
Closure Systems International, Inc. and Novembal USA, Inc.
Undetermined:
Richard Grainger
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart et al
as 6:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
Tinnus Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Kane v. Walgreens Co, et al
as 4:2017cv01223
Plaintiff:
Shaneka Kane
Defendant:
Walgreens Co , Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy and Walgreens Store No. 02135
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ocusoft Inc v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 4:2017cv01037
Plaintiff:
Ocusoft Inc
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreens.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ocadez v. Walgreen Co.
as 7:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Norma Ocadez
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gurrola v. Walgreen Company
as 3:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Gurrola
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Pieper v. Walgreen Co.
as 5:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Sharlyn Pieper
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gamboa v. Walgreen National Corporation
as 7:2017cv00026
Defendant:
Walgreen National Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jorge Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Venable v. Walgreens, Co.
as 4:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Nancy Venable
Defendant:
Walgreens, Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Walgreens Co
as 4:2016cv03571
Defendant:
Walgreens Co
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
