Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Meyer v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.
as 3:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Meyer
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Jackson v. Schlumberger Ltd (Schlumberger N V)
as 6:2016cv00374
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schlumberger Technology Corp v McReynolds et al
as 5:2015cv02455
Plaintiff:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Defendant:
Donald McReynolds and Arklatex Wireline Services L L C
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Dewan, et al v. M-I, L.L.C.
as 4:2015cv01746
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dewan
Defendant:
M-I, L.L.C. , Smith International Acquisition Corp. and Schlumberger Technology Corp
Intervenor:
Sarmad Syed and Ashley Balfour
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Lagrange v. Schlumberger Technology Corp et al
as 6:2015cv01187
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lagrange
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp and M I L L C
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Schlumberger Technology Corp v. Arklatex Wireline Services L L C
as 5:2014cv02818
Defendant:
Arklatex Wireline Services L L C
Plaintiff:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stout v. Pathfinder Energy Services L L C et al
as 6:2014cv02457
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Stout
Defendant:
Pathfinder Energy Services L L C, Smith International Inc, Schlumberger Technology Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Boudreaux et al v. Schlumberger Tech Corp
as 6:2014cv02267
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Plaintiff:
Brock P Boudreaux and Khaled A Barake
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Regan v. Schlumberger Technology Corp
as 6:2014cv02251
Plaintiff:
Christian Regan
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Element Six U.S. Corporation v. Novatek Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Element Six U.S. Corporation
Defendant:
Novatek Inc. , David R Hall and Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
