Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03101
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Siegel v. Kroger Texas LP
as 4:2020cv02963
Plaintiff:
Ronald Siegel
Defendant:
Kroger Texas LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inter-Marketing Group U S A Inc v. Storey et al
as 3:2018cv01650
Defendant:
David D Cole, Peter C Brown, G. Clay Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Inter-Marketing Group U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Siegel et al v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv10592
Plaintiff:
Robert Siegel and Pamela Siegel
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC f/k/a Hospira Worldwide, Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siegel v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10449
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karen Siegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palkon v. CenturyLink Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00998
Defendant:
David D Cole, Peter C Brown, Sunit S Patel and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Palkon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vargas et al v. Sessions et al
as 4:2018cv02531
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Tony Bryson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Maria Vargas and Isabel Gomez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02336
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barbree et al v. Bejar et al
as 3:2018cv00870
Plaintiff:
Michael Barbree, Glen Walker, CenturyLink Inc and others
Defendant:
CenturyLink, Inc., Martha H Bejar, David D Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
