Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00290
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
CRG Partners Group, L.L.C. v. United States Trustee
as 11-10774
Appellee:
CRG Partners Group, L.L.C.
Debtor:
In the Matter of: Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, formerly known as WLR Foods, Incorporated, formerly known as AgraTech Seeds, Incorporated, formerly known as Wampler Foods, Incorporated, formerly known as Gold Kist, Incorporated, formerly known as Pilg
Amicus Curiae:
Baker Botts, L.L.P. and Asarco, L.L.C.
Appellant:
William T. Neary, In His Capacity as the United States Trustee for Region 6
Axcess International Inc v. Baker Botts LLP
as 3:2010cv01383
Plaintiff:
Axcess International Inc
Defendant:
Baker Botts LLP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Michael Bott, et al v. VistaPrint USA Inc., et al
as 09-20648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL P. BOTT, DELORIS GORDON, LAUREL HUDSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VISTAPRINT CORP., VISTAPRINT USA, INC., VISTAPRINT, LTD. and others
v. Baker Botts, L.L.P. et al
as 4:2009cv02492
Defendant:
Baker Botts, L.L.P. and Ernst & Young, LLP
Plaintiff:
FDIC as Receiver for Franklin Bank, S.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Bott v. Vistaprint Corp. et al
as 4:2009cv00356
Plaintiff:
Michael P Bott
Defendant:
VistaPrint Corp., VistaPrint USA Inc, Vertrue, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Baker Botts LLP v. Texas International Property Associates
as 3:2008cv00797
Plaintiff:
Baker Botts LLP and Baker Botts LLP
Defendant:
Texas International Property Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Mann v. FedEx et al
as 4:2007mc00291
Plaintiff:
David Brian Mann
Defendant:
FedEx, the State of Texas, Flying J and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
