Cases 21 - 30 of 966
Armstrong v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00527
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Undre C Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2021cv00526
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Dan Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ameel v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Alexis A Ameel
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ingram et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01749
Plaintiff:
Albert Noel, Nancy Prescott, Phillip Grimes and others
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Little v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00633
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Preston Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barker v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00627
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James A Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fontenot v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00628
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc. and C R Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Effie Fontenot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irwin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00631
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alvis L Irwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00634
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Mae Robinson
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timberlake et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00635
Plaintiff:
Calvin Timberlake and Karen Timberlake
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
