Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Allen v. Stephens. DO NOT DOCKET IN H-16-439. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER H-16-333.
as 4:2016cv00439
Petitioner:
William Andrew Allen
Respondent:
William L Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Stephens. DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:16-cv-361. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:16-cv-333.
as 4:2016cv00361
Petitioner:
William Andrew Allen
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00333
Petitioner:
William Andrew Allen
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Stephens. DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:16-cv-336. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:16-cv-333.
as 4:2016cv00336
Petitioner:
William Andrew Allen
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Williams et al
as 3:2015cv00333
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Allen
Defendant:
Owysy Kwabena, E Jones and A Simon Hasting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Williams et al
as 4:2015cv03238
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Allen
Defendant:
Betty Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCassey v. Hamilton
as 1:2015cv00393
Respondent:
Greg Hamilton
Petitioner:
William Andrew McCassey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCassey v. Hamilton
as 1:2015cv00373
Defendant:
Sheriff Greg Hamilton
Plaintiff:
William Andrew McCassey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCassey v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
William Andrew McCassey
Defendant:
Servants of Travis County at Travis County Correctional Complex Mail Room, Servants on the Travis County District Attorneys Office, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Chenevert et al
as 4:2014cv03711
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Allen
Defendant:
H Chenevert, K Gorsych, Fragland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
