Cases 41 - 50 of 72
AML IP LLC v. Beauty Brands, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
AML IP LLC
Defendant:
Beauty Brands, Inc. and Beauty Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
AML IP LLC v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC and AML IP LLC
Defendant:
Hallmark Cards, Inc., Hallmark Licensing, LLC, Amy's Hallmark and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Atwood Distributing, L.P., Atwoods Ranch & Home, Bath & Body Works, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
AML IP, LLC v. Atwood Distributing, L.P. et al
as 4:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
Atwood Distributing, L.P. and Atwoods Ranch & Home
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
AML IP, LLC v. Bath & Body Works, LLC
as 4:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
AML IP, LLC v. Ashley Furniture Industries, LLC
as 6:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
Ashley Furniture Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
AML IP, LLC v. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
AML IP, LLC v. The Cato Corporation
as 6:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
The Cato Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
AML IP, LLC v. SIGNET GROUP SERVICES US INC.
as 6:2021cv01021
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
SIGNET GROUP SERVICES US INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
AML IP, LLC v. CATNIP GAMES, LLC
as 6:2021cv00821
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
CATNIP GAMES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AML IP, LLC v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
Belk, Inc. and Belk E-Commerce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
