Cases 41 - 50 of 194
Maxim v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03545
Plaintiff:
Alex Maxim
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McGucken v. Displate Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10 Inclusive and Displate Corporation
Plaintiff:
Elliot McGucken
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Sadowski v. Daniel Whyte III d/b/a Gospel Light Society International et al
as 4:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Daniel Whyte, III, Does 1 through 10 inclusive and GLM Omnimedia Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cody B. Tillack v. Sony Rahman
as 4:2018cv04230
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Soni Rahman
Plaintiff:
Cody B. Tillack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sadowski v. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive et al
as 5:2018cv01146
Defendant:
All Black Media Digital Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Stross v. Greenhouse Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00704
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Defendant:
Greenhouse Solutions, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tharp v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv02029
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Doug Tharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wild v. Innova Supply Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wild
Defendant:
Innova Supply Inc. and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Sheila Legodias v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 17-20779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHEILA MAY LEGODIAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED, (MERS) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
