Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Heno v. FedNat Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01864
Plaintiff:
Sharon Heno
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Singh v. FedNat Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv01989
Plaintiff:
Ramesh Singh
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bye v. FedNat Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
Dean Bye
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Reyes v. FedNat Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv01919
Plaintiff:
Anita Reyes
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Bosarge v. FedNat Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
Doris Bosarge
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Herbert et al v. FedNat Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01661
Plaintiff:
Allen Herbert II, Amber Herbert and Allen Herbert, II
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Bean et al v. FedNat Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bean and Tiffany Visor
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Dermody v. FedNat Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01392
Plaintiff:
Mary Dermody
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Demarest v. FedNat Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
Timothy Demarest
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Coleman v. FedNat Insurance Corporation
as 2:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
George Coleman
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Company and FedNat Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
