Cases 41 - 50 of 182
Bailey v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00798
Petitioner:
Gary A Bailey
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00787
Respondent:
James Caldwell and John Smith
Petitioner:
Myron Lamar Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00756
Respondent:
James Caldwell and John Smith
Petitioner:
Myron Lamar Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spears v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2014cv00727
Respondent:
James Caldwell, James LeBlanc and Seth Smith
Petitioner:
Cedric Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Cain et al
as 5:2014cv03309
Plaintiff:
Rufus J Hampton, III
Defendant:
Burl Cain, James M Lablanc and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hampton v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00730
Respondent:
Burl Cain, James Caldwell and James M. LaBlanc
Petitioner:
Rufus J. Hampton, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Randazzo v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00732
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Timothy Randazzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sadler v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00639
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Joshua Sadler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00654
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Wayne Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skipper v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00651
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Phillip Skipper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
