Cases 41 - 50 of 605
Ispas et al v. Emmel et al
as 4:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
Mihai Dan Ispas, Anca Ispas, Alexandru Ispas and others
Defendant:
CHIEF IIPO ALISSA EMMEL, UR M. JADDOU and Alissa Emmel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Vargas et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Martha Vargas and Raquel Ludim Ruiz
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M Jaddou and Secretary Antony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. DHS
as 24-40160
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Valerie Laveus, Francis Arauz, Paul Zito and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Stellamaris E. Williams
Defendant:
Director Ur M Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
