Cases 51 - 60 of 328
Cannon v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00120
Respondent:
Nathan Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Johnny Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Miller et al
as 1:2015cv00481
Plaintiff:
Miguel Williamson
Defendant:
Philip T Miller, Eric B Holder and James D Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lucas v. Goodwin et al
as 3:2015cv00111
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell and Jerry Goodwin
Petitioner:
Lee Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00102
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Douglas Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaVergne v. Louisiana State Penitentiary et al
as 3:2015cv00086
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain, James D Caldwell, Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Petitioner:
Brandon S. LaVergne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. Cooley et al
as 3:2015cv00073
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell, Jr. and Keith Cooley
Petitioner:
Colby Dranoel Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Warden et al
as 3:2015cv00049
Respondent:
James D Caldwell and Unknown Warden
Petitioner:
Bruce Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00097
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain, James D Caldwell and James M. LeBlanc
Petitioner:
Curtis Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steelman v. Cain
as 5:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steelman
Defendant:
Burl Cain and James D Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00045
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jimmie Darnell Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
