Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,498
General Security National Insurance Corporation v. Celi Sr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01682
Plaintiff: General Security National Insurance Corporation
Defendant: Otto Salvador Celi Sr, Gocci U.S. Corporation, State National Insurance Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lafitte Investments II L L C v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 3:2023cv01771
Plaintiff: Lafitte Investments II, LLC and Lafitte Investments II L L C
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Cedar Ridge, LLC et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv07350
Plaintiff: Cedar Ridge, LLC and Bruno Brothers Management and Development Company, Inc.
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company and others
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Stewart Development, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London et al
as 2:2023cv07303
Plaintiff: Stewart Development, LLC
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. AMR-53446-06, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona and others
Counter Claimant: QBE Specialty Insurance Company and Steadfast Insurance Company
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Duplantis v. MMA
as 23-30870
Plaintiff: Sara Duplantis
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Subscribing to Policy No. LI638813-02, improperly names as Underwriters at Lloyds London
Petitioner / Appellant: MMA P.L.L.C., formerly known as McClenny, Moseley & Associates, P.L.L.C.
Type: Contract Insurance
Knowles v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London (Lloyds of London)
as 2:2023cv07263
Plaintiff: Clayton Knowles
Defendant: Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Lloyds of London)
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
La Belle Maison v. AmRisc
as 23-30864
Plaintiff / Appellant: La Belle Maison Associates, L.L.C., Bou MIkael Enterprises Incorporated, Sami Bou-Mikael and others
Defendant / Appellee: AmRisc, L.P., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, severally subscribing to Certificate Number AMR-38859-07, Indian Harbor Insurance Company and others
Defelice et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 2:2023cv07247
Plaintiff: Stacy Defelice and Charles Tant
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Contract Insurance
Jeansonne et al v. Velocity Risk Underwriters, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv07198
Plaintiff: Earl Jeansonne, Shirley Jeansonne, The Jeansonne Apartments LLC d/b/a The 121 Athenia Apartments and others
Defendant: Velocity Risk Underwriters, LLC, Independent Specialty Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Other Insurers Subscribing to Binding Authority B60451056822021 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Claudel v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 2:2023cv07184
Plaintiff: Margaret Melissa Glenn Claudel
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Chubb European Group SE
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?