Cases 1 - 10 of 2,076
Mendoza et al v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc.
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Delfino Mendoza III and Gianni Aurora Mendoza
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AL SAADAWI v. USCIS - Houston District Office et al
as 4:2024cv03423
Plaintiff:
AHMED AL SAADAWI
Defendant:
Alamdar Hamadani, District Director USCIS - Houston District Office and DIRECTOR USCIS UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03389
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mendoza v. Walmart INC et al
as 7:2024cv00368
Defendant:
Wal-mart Stores Texas, LLC and Walmart INC
Plaintiff:
Ana Bertha Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
