Cases 1 - 3 of 3
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10718
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Incorporated, Gun Owners for Safety, Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund and others
Fredric Mance, Jr., et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al
as 15-10311
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TRACEY AMBEAU HANSON, CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, FREDRIC RUSSELL MANCE, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, B. TODD JONES, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
National Rifle Association, et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, et al
as 11-10959
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, MOTHERS AGAINST TEEN VIOLENCE, STUDENTS FOR GUN-FREE SCHOOLS IN TEXAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, ANDREW M. PAYNE, REBEKAH JENNINGS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, KENNETH MELSON, In His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
