Cases 1 - 10 of 548
Hicks et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
TED HICKS and GRAND LAKE LLC
Defendant:
United States, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Col. Cullen Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Umutoni et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
Ines Umutoni, Regis Kabanda and Klein Irankunda
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Folekeu v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
Cherif Folekeu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vinet et al v. Stillwater Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Ted Vinet and Dianne Lewis Vinet
Defendant:
Stillwater Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
as 4:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Ted Smith, Robert Hambleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
