Cases 91 - 100 of 7,858
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lathfield Investments, LLC, et al v. City of Lathrup Village, MI, et al
as 24-1318
Plaintiff:
LATHFIELD INVESTMENTS, LLC, LATHFIELD HOLDINGS, LLC and LATHFIELD PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF LATHRUP VILLAGE, MI and LATHRUP VILLAGE, MI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Landon Harrod v. Kenya Lee, et al
as 24-5228
Plaintiff:
LANDON HARROD
Defendant:
KENYA LEE, ROCKY RUEHLING, CITY OF TULLAHOMA, TN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Justin Hodyka v. Thomas Amross, et al
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HODYKA
Defendant:
THOMAS AMROSS, City of Taylor Police Officer, in their individual capacity, jointly and severally, JORDAN CHAMBERLAIN, City of Taylor Police Officer, in their individual capacity, jointly and severally, BRENT STUDER, City of Taylor Police Officer, in their individual capacity, jointly and severally and others
Nationwide Recovery, Incorporated, et al v. City of Detroit, MI
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE RECOVERY, INCORPORATED, JULIA HUSSEIN, HUSSEIN M. HUSSEIN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Jonathan Lindsey, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 24-1413
Plaintiff:
SENATOR JONATHAN LINDSEY, SENATOR JAMES RUNESTAD, REPRESENTATIVE JAMES R. DESANA and others
Defendant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, In Her Official Capacity as Governor of Michigan, or Her Successor, JOCELYN BENSON, In Her Official Capacity as Michigan Secretary of State, or Her Successor and JONATHAN BRATER, In His Official Capacity as Director of Elections, or His Successor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
