Cases 91 - 100 of 5,095
Clifford Frost, Jr. v. Dana Nessel
as 24-1132
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JAMES FROST, JR.
Defendant:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan; in official capacity
Ryan Slowik, et al v. Keith Lambert
as 24-5132
Plaintiff:
RYAN SLOWIK, VALERIE SLOWIK, A. S., Minor and others
Defendant:
KEITH LAMBERT
Tracie Hunter v. Richard Dove, et al
as 24-3111
Plaintiff:
TRACIE HUNTER and TRACIE M. HUNTER
Defendant:
RICHARD A. DOVE, Individually and in his official capacity as Director for the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct of the State of Ohio and JOSEPH CALIGUIRI, Individually and in his official capacity as Disciplinary Counsel
Kimberly Potter v. Debra Wehrle, et al
as 24-3097
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY POTTER
Defendant:
DEBRA GORRELL WEHRLE, AUBREY COOK and OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Dwayne Seals v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE SEALS
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI and WAYNE COUNTY, MI EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Gregory Bartko v. Michael Goetz, et al
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BARTKO
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOETZ, Administrator of the Attorney Grievance Commission, DINA P. DAJANI, Former Senior Counsel to the Attorney Grievance Commission, MARK A. ARMITAGE, Executive Director of the Attorney Discipline Board and others
Hussain Alfatlawy v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 24-1080
Plaintiff:
HUSSAIN ALFATLAWY
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, OFFICER JALYN CHARLES and OFFICER DARWIN SMITH
Bernard Howard v. Dale Collins, et al
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
BERNARD HOWARD
Defendant:
REGINALD HARVEL, DALE COLLINS, WILLIAM RICE and others
In re: Donald Visser, et al
as 24-1072
Appellant:
In re: DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN JAMES VISSER and VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC
Pamela Moses v. TN, et al
as 24-5086
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. MOSES
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, AMY P. WEIRICH, in her individual capacity and STEVEN JOHN MULROY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
