Cases 51 - 60 of 5,096
Lesly Pompy v. First Merchants Bank, et al
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
LESLY POMPY, President, Interventional Pain Management Associates, PC
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK, fka Monroe Bank & Trust, MARC MOORE, Lt., Mantis, BRIAN BISHOP, Agent, Diversion Investigator, DEA and others
Donald Freed v. Michelle Thomas, et al
as 24-1251
Plaintiff:
DONALD FREED
Defendant:
MICHELLE THOMAS and GRATIOT COUNTY, MI
Intervenor:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mawule Tepe v. IRS, et al
as 24-5261
Plaintiff:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dimitar Petlechkov v. Michael Stengel, et al
as 24-5254
Plaintiff:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. STENGEL, dba Stengel Law Firm, P.C. and STENGEL LAW FIRM, P.C.
Elizabeth Nelson, et al v. Service Towing, Inc., et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NELSON and ALBERT D. THROWER
Defendant:
SERVICE TOWING, INC., ABLE TOWING, LLC, EDWARD D. HERTZ, President and others
Theodore Aleck, et al v. Havenpark Management, LLC, et al
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
THEODORE JAMES ALECK, DANIELLE TIA FRASER and TIA DANIELLE FRASER
Defendant:
HAVENPARK MANAGEMENT, LLC and SPRINGBROOK ESTATES
Kevin Burke v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al
as 24-3222
Plaintiff:
KEVIN P. BURKE
Defendant:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, EMMA COLLINS, Warden, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Delmas Edwards, Jr. v. Caitlyn Bazerghi
as 24-1204
Plaintiff:
DELMAS PIERRE EDWARDS, JR.
Defendant:
CAITLYN BAZERGHI
Mike Pop v. Brookfield Chrysler Dodge Jeep, Inc., et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff:
MIKE POP
Defendant:
BROOKFIELD CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP, INC., a Michigan Corporation, GREGORY GUNTHER, ANDREW BEAM and others
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5219
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
