Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Donnetta Daggett v. Postmaster General
as 16-1440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNETTA DAGGETT
Defendant - Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL, for the United States Postal Service
Inge Goodson v. Megan J. Brennan
as 16-5023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INGE GOODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, In his official capacity As Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 15-1768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her individual and professional capacity, MARYL R. ROSEN, USPS Attorney, in her individual and professional capacity and others
Lucy Deiters v. Patrick Donahoe
as 14-6518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUCY M. DEITERS
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Eastern Area), Agency
Bamrung Chumpia v. USPS, et al
as 14-5637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BAMRUNG P. CHUMPIA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, or President of Michigan State U., SECRETARY OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Harry Conner v. USPS, et al
as 14-5399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY CONNER, Designated Beneficiary & Sole Heir of Mary Conner Nelson (deceased)
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Office of Worder's Compensation Program, METLIFE, Inc. and others
Joyce Nixon v. USPS, et al
as 13-4266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE ANN NIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and PATRICK R. DONAHOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-6292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
