Cases 1 - 10 of 43
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Kimberly Potter v. Debra Wehrle, et al
as 24-3097
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY POTTER
Defendant:
DEBRA GORRELL WEHRLE, AUBREY COOK and OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 23-5929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Renard Austin, et al v. Michael Mosley, et al
as 23-1425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENARD MONTEZ AUSTIN and URSULA COOK
Defendant:
MICHAEL MOSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor and DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT, individually, and in his official capacity as an employee of MDHHS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
