Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3316
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5192
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-6489
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2717
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Thomas, Jr. v. TN Depart. of Transportation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6544
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM H. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BBF Engineering Services, PC, et al v. MI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2209
Plaintiff: BFF ENGINEERING SERVICES, PC
Plaintiff - Appellant: BELLANDRA FOSTER and BBF ENGINEERING SERVICES, PC
Defendant: MICHIGAN, STATE OF and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Defendant - Appellee: VICTOR JUDNIC, MARK STEUCHER, RICK SNYDER, Governor of the State of Michigan and others
State of Tennessee, et al v. Kathy Noble
as 13-5752
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, WILLIAM HASLAM, SCOTT FOSTER, Hendersonville Mayor and others
Defendant - Appellant: KATHY NOBLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5647
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Niehaus v. Cincinnati City of, et al
as 13-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID A. NIEHAUS
Defendant - Appellee: CINCINNATI CITY OF, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and HAMILTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Calvin Murry v. Detroit Department of Transpor, et al
as 12-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant: CALVIN MURRY
Defendant - Appellee: DETROIT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and JOHN DOE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?