Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Jane Doe 1, et al v. William Thornbury, Jr., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-5609
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN MINOR DOE 1, by and through his next friend, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. THORNBURY, JR., MD, in his official capacity as the President of the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, et al.
Intervenor:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL DANIEL CAMERON
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-3396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roseanne Breezley v. Ham Co Bd of Comm., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-3345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSEANNE BREEZLEY, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of James W. Barton
Defendant - Appellee:
HAMILTON COUNTY/BOARD OF HAMILTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF JIM NEIL, JAMES COULTER, Hamilton County Jail Physician and Medical Director and others
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE, #3-10, any physicians, nurses, hospitals, corporations, health care professionals, correction officers or other entities, that provided deliberately indifferent and/or negligent medical care to James Barton Individually or by and through th
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Steward v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 13-2348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM G. STEWARD, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN, STATE OF, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SUSAN COOK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.