Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Eric Hammonds v. Theresa Crowe, et al
as 23-5974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC T. HAMMONDS
Defendant / Appellee:
THERESA CROWE, CLEO COLEMAN, JOSEPH A. KELLY, Esquire and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dawan Thurmond, et al v. Jessica Cooper
as 16-1142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWAN PIERCE THURMOND
Plaintiff:
LEDELL HAMMOND and JOSEPH KENNEDY SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSICA COOPER, Oakland County Prosecutor
Rodney Harper v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-5763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY LOUIS HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, in her capacity as Attorney General of the United States EEOC, JACQUELINE A. BERRIEN, in her capacity as Chair of the EEOC, KATHERINE KORES, in her capacity as District Office Director of the EEOC and others
Ronnie Keys v. Central Mortgage Company, et al
as 14-2623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE KEYS
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, TROTT & TROTT, KEVIN HAMMOND and others
Katherine Cordell v. Town Of Signal Mountain, TN, et al
as 14-6421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE CORDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF SIGNAL MOUNTAIN, TN, BARBARA WRIGHT, AL BALL and others
Ronald Madden v. City of Chattanooga, et al
as 11-5023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. MADDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, Governamental Agencis of the City of Chattanooga Mayor's Office at City Hall, sued in their individual and official capacities, WILLIAM H. COX, Officer of the Attorney General's Office, sued in their individual and official capacities, REBECCA STERN, Criminal Court Judge, sued in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
CHATTANOOGA BONDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED and W.B. COLLINS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-6466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
