Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5083
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dominique Morrow v. Tracy Stoner, et al
as 14-4095
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOMINIQUE A. MORROW
Defendant - Appellee: MAGISTRATE TRACY D. STONER, BAILIFF STEVE NORMAN, JUDGE CAROL J. DEZSO and others
Morris & Morris, PSC, et al v. Gayle Slaughter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5501
Plaintiff: KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: MORRIS & MORRIS P.S.C.
Defendant - Appellee: LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, Individually and official capacity, JAMES AMATO and others
Keith Guy, Sr., et al v. LFUCG, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5496
Plaintiff: KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: REX ROE #48, #62, #91, #97, #103, On behalf of themselves and all others who are similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, in official and individual capacity, JAMES AMATO, Individually and others
Lauresse Sherrills v. Cuyahoga County Corrections, et al
as 14-3028
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAURESSE SHERRILLS, Administrator of the Estate of, Laroy Sherrills
Defendant - Appellee: CUYAHOGA COUNTY CORRECTIONS CENTER, HEALTH CARE SERVICES, CUYAHOGA COUNTY and others
Defendant: MIDWEST MEDICAL STAFFING, INC.
Kathy Coleman v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 13-3011
Plaintiff - Appellant: KATHY WRAY COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF CLEVELAND, ROBERT J. TRIOZZI, FRANK G. JACKSON and others
Elizabeth O'Brien v. Michael Navarre, et al
as 11-3893
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELIZABETH A. O'BRIEN
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL NAVARRE, Individually, and in his official capacity as Chief, Toledo Police Division, MICHAEL MCGEE, Sergeant, Toledo Police Division, DAVID MOSINIAK, Officer, Toledo Police Division and others
Kathy Coleman v. Cuyahoga County Board of Comm, et al
as 11-3422
Plaintiff - Appellant: KATHY W. COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee: CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, GERALD T. MCFAUL, Cuyahoga County Sheriff, KEVIN MCDONOUGH, Head Warden and others
James O'Neill, et al v. Louisville/Jefferson County Me, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5699
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES O'NEILL and ANGELA O'NEILL
Defendant - Appellee: LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, LOUISVILLE METRO ANIMAL SERVICES, GILES MELOCHE, in his individual and official capacities and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?