Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Brian H. Herschfus, et al v. City of Oak Park, MI, et al
as 24-1451
Defendant: CITY OF OAK PARK, MI, a municipal corporation, JOHN OR JANE DOE, code official(s) Jointly and Severally, ROBERT BARRETT, Technical and Planning Services Director and others
Plaintiff: BRIAN H. HERSCHFUS, individually and as Trustee and BRIAN H. HERSCHFUS AND FERN SHARI HERSCHFUS JOINT REVOCABLE TRUST, u/a/d March 22, 1994 as amended
John and Jane Doe No.1, et al v. Bethel Local School District Board of Education, et al
as 23-3740
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN AND JANE DOE NO.1, Legal Guardians on behalf of Child No.1A, JOHN AND JANE DOE NO. 2, JOHN DOE NO. 3, Legal Guardian on behalf of Child No. 3B and Child No. 3C and others
Defendant / Appellee: BETHEL LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, LYDDA MANSFIELD, In official capacity, LORI SEBASTIAN, In official capacity and others
Intervenor / Appellee: ANNE ROE
Michael Darden v. Montgomery Cnty, OH Board of County Commissioners, et al
as 23-3501
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL A. DARDEN
Defendant / Appellee: MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OH BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION and others
Lutfi Saalim v. Walmart, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-3217
Plaintiff / Appellant: LUTFI SAID SAALIM
Defendant / Appellee: WALMART, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, LUCAS COUNTY, OH BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, on behalf of Lucas County, Ohio and others
Jeanna Norris, et al v. Samuel Stanley, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1200
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEANNA NORRIS, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated, KRAIG EHM and D'ANN ROHRER
Defendant / Appellee: SAMUEL L. STANLEY, JR., in his official capacity as President of Michigan State University, DIANNE BYRUM, in her official capacity as Chair of the Board of Trustees, DAN KELLY, in his official capacity as Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees and others
Linda Ruffin v. Cuyahoga County, Ohio, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3772
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINDA RUFFIN, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Deceased Robert Sharp
Defendant - Appellee: CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO, CLIFF PINKNEY, Cuyahoga County Sheriff, in his official capacity as Cuyahoga County Sheriff, METROHEALTH SYSTEM and others
Jose Melendez v. Dennis Will, et al
as 17-3402
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE MELENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee: DENNIS WILL, DETECTIVE SIVERT, #701, JUDGE MIRALDI and others
TN, et al v. Bill Gibbons, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-5187
Plaintiff: STATE OF TENNESSEE, on relationship, of and
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS PATTERSON, in his individual capacity and as Relator for the State of Tennessee and as Representative for Class Members
Defendant - Appellee: BILL GIBBONS, JOHN AND JANE DOES, as a Class of Tennessee officers, directors, managers and employees whose conduct is covered by Tennessee's blanket security bond,, FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, as surety for Defendants Gibbons, Martin, and Tennessee John and Jane Does and others
Reginald Barnes v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 16-4130
Plaintiff - Appellant: REGINALD BARNES
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF CLEVELAND, CITY OF CLEVELAND PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU and CITY OF CLEVELAND PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU AND PHOTO SAFETY DIVISION
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES
Paul Markowitz v. The University of Memphis, et al
as 16-6421
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAUL S. MARKOWITZ, and as Next of Friend for Stan Bronson
Defendant - Appellee: THE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS, JOHN AND JANE DOES, # 1-10 in their individual and official capacities, JOHN AND JANE DOES, in their individual and official capacities as employment and employers for the University of Memphis Police or security employees for the State of Tennessee University campus police and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?