Cases 1 - 10 of 7,812
Michael Poffenbarger v. Frank Kendall, III, et al
as 24-3417
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POFFENBARGER, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, LIEUTENANT GENERAL ROBERT I. MILLER, in his official capacity as Surgeon General of the Air Force, LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD W. SCOBEE, in his official capacity as Commander, Air Force Reserve Command and others
Sonja Overall v. Oakland County, MI, et al
as 24-1426
Plaintiff:
SONJA M. OVERALL, Individually and Personal Representative of the Estate of Eric Brian Overall
Defendant:
OAKLAND COUNTY, MI, LAPEER COUNTY, MI, GENESEE COUNTY, MI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Skilwies v. City of Huber Heights, OH, et al
as 24-3407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SKILWIES
Defendant:
CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS, OH, CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nationwide Recovery, Incorporated, et al v. City of Detroit, MI
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE RECOVERY, INCORPORATED, JULIA HUSSEIN, HUSSEIN M. HUSSEIN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Albert Pickett, Jr., et al v. City of Cleveland, OH
as 24-3395
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
Landon Harrod v. Kenya Lee, et al
as 24-5228
Plaintiff:
LANDON HARROD
Defendant:
KENYA LEE, ROCKY RUEHLING, CITY OF TULLAHOMA, TN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
