Cases 11 - 20 of 1,211
Gregory Cook v. Michelle Dunham, et al
as 24-1466
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. COOK, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE DUNHAM, GOA Mailroom, CARRIE KIENITZ, GOA Mailroom, SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden and others
D'Andre Brown v. FBOP, et al
as 24-5403
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRE ROLAND BROWN
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE #1, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary, JOHN DOE #2, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary and others
Jacob Weld v. Melinda Braman
as 24-1449
Petitioner:
JACOB JOHN WELD
Respondent:
MELINDA K. BRAMAN, Warden
Kenneth Mobley v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5477
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOBLEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN F. J. BOWERS, FCI Memphis and others
Jimmy Hindman v. John Doe, et al
as 24-5311
Plaintiff:
JIMMY DOYLE HINDMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Unknown Federal Prison Guard in Memphis, TN, ANGELA M. OWENS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, official and personal capacity, named as Heidi Washington, JEREMY BUSH, Deputy Director, official and personal capacity, ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN MCKINNEY, official and personal capacity and others
Louis Fontanez v. Eric Rardin
as 24-1421
Petitioner:
LOUIS JOHN FONTANEZ
Respondent:
ERIC RARDIN, Warden
Michael Johnson v. Brian Barney, et al
as 24-3287
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BARNEY, JASON JOSEPH, WILLIAM COOL and others
Jaquan Lee v. Heath Underwood, et al
as 24-3271
Plaintiff:
JAQUAN LEE
Defendant:
HEATH UNDERWOOD, AARON BUSHEY, DAVID SCHEURER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
