Cases 21 - 30 of 208
Antrell Brown v. MI, et al
as 22-1136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTRELL VONICQUE BROWN, aka Islamic Ali
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANA NESSEL and others
William Graham v. P. Landon
as 22-5032
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
P. LANDON, Warden
Michael DeSpain v. Louisville Metropolitan Government, et al
as 21-6237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DESPAIN and MICHAEL R. DESPAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, STEVE CONRAD, Chief of Police, LIEUTENANT KIT STEMILE and others
Yaqob Thomas v. Joseph Meko
as 17-5824
Petitioner - Appellant:
YAQOB TAFAN THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH P. MEKO
Michael Flick v. Joseph Meko
as 17-5812
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOSEPH FLICK
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH P. MEKO
Edward May v. Francisco Quintana
as 17-5769
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD P. MAY
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden
Jeremy Gallant v. Faisal Ahmed, et al
as 17-3511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY P. GALLANT
Defendant - Appellee:
FAISAL AHMED, MONA PARKS, HAWKINS and others
Defendant:
MAHLMAN, GARY C. MOHR and CADOGAN
William Davis, Jr. v. W. Brill, et al
as 17-5470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
W. EARL BRILL, United States District Court Judge, BARBARA D. KOSHE, United States District Attorney, DR. CONNTRAL INLVIN and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Marquette Benson v. Chris Craft, et al
as 17-5379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARQUETTE D. BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE CHRIS CRAFT and AMY P. WEIRICH, District Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
