Cases 41 - 50 of 282
Steven Nicholson v. Noah Nagy
as 22-1586
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN NICHOLSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NOAH NAGY, Warden
Steven Staub v. Tracy Nietzel, et al
as 22-5384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN STAUB
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACY NIETZEL, MARCUS FAULKNER, JONATHAN BEASLEY and others
James Eakes v. KY, et al
as 22-5483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EAKES
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, FULTON COUNTY, KY, FULTON COUNTY, KY JAIL and others
James Miller v. John Davids, et al
as 22-1335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, in their individual and official capacities, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden, in their individual and official capacities, MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden, in their individual and official capacities and others
Kevin Tolliver v. Keith Foley, et al
as 22-3382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH J. FOLEY, Warden, STANLEY TAYLOR, MATTHEW CHRISTLER and others
Rodney Martin v. USA
as 22-1434
Petitioner / Appellant:
RODNEY STEVEN MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rebekah Buetenmiller, et al v. Macomb County Jail, et al
as 22-1103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH BUETENMILLER, SAMANTHA BILLS and STACEY GLASS
Defendant / Appellee:
MACOMB COUNTY, MI JAIL, STEVEN COGSWELL, WILLIAM HORAN and others
Oliver Ingram v. Steven Merlak
as 17-3067
Petitioner / Appellant:
OLIVER CHRISTOPHER INGRAM
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN MERLAK, Warden
Danielle Scott v. Daryl Becher, et al
as 17-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIELLE S. SCOTT, named as Danielle Steven Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
DARYL BECHER, Correctional Transportation Officer, SUSAN BUSKIRK, Registered Nurse and UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Healthcare Workers
Erick Chapmon v. S. Merlak
as 17-3801
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERICK R. CHAPMON
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN MERLAK, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
