Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Stephen Phillips v. Watkins, et al
as 23-5816
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN PHILLIPS
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT WATKINS, HARDEMAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and CORE CIVIC SOLUTIONS
Edgar Goodwin v. Jim Hammond, et al
as 23-5338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDGAR GOODWIN
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM HAMMOND, DIRECTOR SHIAN, NURSE ROWE and others
Phillip Watkins v. USA
as 22-4000
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP WATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. K. Cauley, et al
as 22-5998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BOP OFFICER K. CAULEY, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, CAMP ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, ASSISTANT WARDEN HALL, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity and others
Lavares Watkins v. Bryan K. Dobbs
as 22-5632
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAVARES DETROEN WATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Warden and BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
ERICA HUSS, JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ERICA HUSS, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Napolean Watkins v. Robert Napel
as 17-1702
Petitioner - Appellant:
NAPOLEAN WATKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT NAPEL, Warden
Lincoln Watkins v. Jeffrey Wood
as 17-1388
Petitioner - Appellant:
LINCOLN ANDERSON WATKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden
Raymond Kirkendall v. John Jaramillo, et al
as 16-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. KIRKENDALL
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN D. JARAMILLO, Sgt.
Defendant - Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] CONKLIN, Sgt., [UNKNOWN] CONNER, Correctional Officer, DEWEY S. WATKINS, C/O and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
