Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Antonio Clark v. Adam Cruter, et al
as 24-5352
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CLARK
Defendant:
ADAM D. CRUTER, Officer, ERIC JACKSON, Officer, RHETT BUDDY, Officer and others
William Martin, II v. Clark Scott
as 24-3173
Petitioner:
WILLIAM E. MARTIN, II
Respondent:
DAVID W. GRAY, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution and CLARK SCOTT, Acting Warden, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
Christopher Smith v. David Dawdy, et al
as 23-2043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CARSON SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DAWDY, Corrections Mental Health Program Director, official and personal capacity, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, official capacity, GREG JOHNSON, Corrections Mental Health Program Involuntary Treatment, personal capacity and others
Michael Clark v. USA
as 23-5820
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Clark v. USA
as 23-5784
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Clark v. USA
as 23-5555
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Billie Chapman, et al v. Tony Parker, et al
as 23-5534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN
Plaintiff:
IAN J. CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, VINCENT VANTELL, Acting Warden, LIEUTENANT JACKSON and others
Mario Clarke v. Michael Burgess
as 23-1459
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO JERMAINE CLARKE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL BURGESS
Ray Heid, et al v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 23-3367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY SCOTT HEID and JAMES E. DAMRON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, Director, ROGER WILSON, Chief Inspector, TREVOR CLARK, Individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
